Growing up in Washington DC I developed a
different concept of and relationship to the monuments. They were a constant
presence in my life, which did not diminish their importance, but without the
emphasis on destination that so many people from America and around the world
experience through trips to visit the monuments, they become an odd combination
of being commonplace yet grand. I don't have a specific first memory of one of
the memorials but was more aware of the Washington Monument in particular as a
part of my personal identity, and what I consider to be part of my home. The neoclassical
style of the monuments, so closely spaced, creates a feeling of grandeur
similar to that which the Romans wished to communicate throughout their empire.
It is mythical and otherworldly, and the monuments seem to have stood there for
thousands of years, such was my experience with the Memorial Bridge. I remember
driving home from the Kennedy Center one night when I was about 8 years old,
and specifically the way the moonlight was reflecting off the water and hitting
the repetitive semi-circle arches beneath the bridge, which while incredible in
their massiveness, they do not even come close to the spectacularly ornamented
top side. The end at the Lincoln Memorial has two enormous bronze statues of
men with horses that are shockingly large upon first sight. Despite their glory
and the proud memorials that the bridge connects, it is the underside that is
engrained in my memory, like the foundation for our society today, which is immortalized
in the monuments.
Sarah Whelihan
I like how you've played with overt and subvert//topside vs underside.
ReplyDelete